"Rings," the latest reboot of the horror franchise, is fatally short on scares.

F. Javier Gutierrez’s super-superfluous second sequel to The Ring is completely incoherent

"Someone texts 'Don't Watch It!' Sound advice." Read Peter Travers' zero-stars review of 'Rings,' the D.O.A. addition to Americanized J-horror series.

Have you heard about that movie that’s headed to video sooner rather than later? They say you start watching it, and after 100 minutes, you’re dead from boredom.

Rings takes its premise from last years nauseating Sadako vs. Kayako (Ring vs. The Grudge), but instead of director F. Javier Gutierrez...

Samara crawls out of the smartphone in this frightfully dull second sequel in a horror franchise better off dead.

Justin Chang reviews Rings, the latest installment of the horror franchise, costarring Johnny Galecki

Is the third entry in the Rings franchise worth a fright? Read Empire's verdict.

F Javier Gutiérrez’s update of the Japanese cult horror flick comes up with a fair mystery and an admirably loopy finale featuring swarming cicadas

Or: how to turn one terrifying movie into an increasingly dumb, incoherent franchise

Paramount has revived "The Ring" cycle with "Rings," a middling update that has few of the chills and little of the suspense of the J-horror original, or its Hollywood version. The ever-cloudy Pacific Northwest is still home to "the videotape that kills you if you watch it." That's a story related by one young passenger…

Japanese horror franchise reboot falls flat

Check out Matt Donato's review of Rings, the next curse of Samara that plans to bring her deadly ways to the digital age.

The latest entry in the "Ring" franchise falls short for more than one reason.

This strange sequel comes 15 years after the terrifying American remake of a Japanese horror classic.

The cursed videotape returns in a warmed-over horror rehash.

Rings: EW review